|
|
This site is
made, written and updated
by
zainea
liviu

|
| |
|
R1's
TESTS...

Roundffusor1's Critical Measurements
made by the inventor
Measurement
setup
1. The
source - a loudspeaker
IMF Professional Reference
Standard MK IV (a 2,5 m long
transmission line
loudspeaker, down to 17 Hz),
positioned at 3,8 meters and
45 degrees lateral to the 12
grouped R1's axis - a matrix
of 3 R1 horizontally by 4
vertically- driven by an
amplifier (one channel,
130W, class A) directly from
a TEF20 unit.
2. The sensors
a. a PVR1 - OMNI ELCTRET mike ,
laterally covered with protective
air plastic foil in order not to
touch the R1's body.
b. a miniature 3 grams Bruel
accelerometer model 4500, serial
nr.1804165, driven by the TEF20
towards a DeltraTron power supply WB
1372.
A calibration was not necessary,
what was asked was:
a. the relative levels between the
loudspeaker's wood cabin - at the
lateral wall at the woofer height
[the accelerometer glued using
double face adhesive tape ]and two
places upon the outside R1's
surface, and
b. the relative levels between a
multitude of positions, recorded by
the above mike
inside
the R1's column long of 232 cm, the
loudspeaker being at 3,8 meters away
from the center of the R1's grouped
surface .
|
|
|

When and How does the grouped R1
work ? Why is so important to know ?
|
|
|
A. Accelerometer measurements |
|
|
 |
|
|
level1 - This is a normal
music listening level |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
level
2 - Here is a higher signal level
than level1 |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
Here above are shown the results
from the highest signal level
applied to de loudspeaker, relative
to the two above measurements levels
- 1 and 2.
* with white - the recorder signal
from the accelerometer glued upon
the loudspeaker's wood cabin
** other colors- the recorded
signals from the accelerometer,
glued upon the two different R1's
surfaces - exactly in the middle of
each R1, at the cross point.
|
|
| |
|
|
Conclusions 1
A. Accelerometer's
measurements
1. In all situations, the
displacements recorded by the
accelerometer on the loudspeaker's
wood cabinet were bigger than that
sensed on two different [ but
grouped] R1. Please note that each
IMF speaker weights about 47 Kg and
each R1 less than 2 Kg.
2. Somehow, the spectral
irregularities recorded on the wood
cabin's surface are filtered out
upon the R1's surface. This means
that at any source's
levels, the R1's plastic body
resonate somehow less than heavy
loudspeaker's cabin, the small
displacements waves are following
the speaker's ones. |
|
| |
|
|
B. Microphone measurements taken
inside of the R1's columns |
|
|
 |
|
|
The microphone took measurements
from both lateral column of 3
vertically columns of R1 |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
The microphone took measurements
from the central column of a 3
vertically R1's columns ( in the
matrix of 3 horizontally x 4
vertically) |
|
| |
|
|
Conclusions 2
B. Microphone's measurements
1. The low frequency point were the
grouped R1 are changing towards the
mid and high frequency is 181 Hz.
2. It is clear that the R1 must be
kept absolutely empty and not be
filled with any kind of porous
material, the air back absorption -
complex Helmholtz resonator with
very large aperture -
being between 10 and 25 dB lower
that the low frequencies inside the
columns and of course, the whole,
lower than the field level in the
room. And all this, is done
practically simultaneously with the
incident sound, because our hearing
system cannot perceive...when. This
''when'',
in my opinion is the human
perception's delay. So the
said...real time, is not quite that.
About this
when,
more at
{
such
things
are
impossible
?
}
3. The back air absorption is almost
linear and this explain the same
almost linear frequency responses.
We speak about linearity but in fact
is the musical bass
surplus
which is reduced by the grouped R1
surface, for a certain room
and audio system and song.
The recorded phase is remarkable
stable at all points of
measurements.
The superposition principle is
somehow accomplished practically,
even if extremely hard to be
mathematically modeled.
4. As described earlier in the site,
each R1's column, behave
differently, reacting dynamically
with the rooms modes and the always
changing stereo signal, much more
being done for low frequencies into
the lateral R1's columns and less towards
the R1's grouped surface center.
Please note, that in the
microphone's measurement case, the
frequency resolution is higher at
22.3 Hz than the 52.2 Hz in the
accelerometer's case.
For clarity, all measurements were
smoothed to 33% or 1/3 octave. |
|
| |
|
|
Roundffusor1's published,
independent aural tests , all in
Greek language.
>
'Hxos-Eikona'':
R1's Test
>
AV Pro's article: R1's Test
>
Radio-Link's
article: R1's Test
>
Radio-Link
- Zainea Liviu Interview


Much better acoustics : Big
recording studios or live stage
performances
A simple example of a wide open
trapezoid geometry made from grouped
R1 ,
embracing the performers and
directing the sound field towards
the microphones or public

| |
Compan y
address : Mr. Zainea Liviu Nikolae / ESR, 14 Peresiadou
street, TK11141 Athens, Greece
>
Tel/Fax: 0030 210 20 27 191
>
Mobile: 0030 693 66 07 321
>
Email:
liviu@zainea.com
First page
|
|
|
|
|
|